Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Monday, December 31, 2012

The beginning of a new story - 1917

This story just fell together tonight, with no preparation and hardly any inspiration. Hope you enjoy it. I'd like to continue it sometime but there's that pesky Blue Umbrella novel I finished writing but haven't edited yet to start 2013. Here goes:

Kublai Khan, captain of the airship Demagogue. What a bizarre title, yet it was real. Kublai, of course, didn’t think it bizarre at all. It was the title he inherited from his grandfather Genghis.

The one who thought it bizarre was Woodrow Wilson, president of the United States of America. Unwieldy though it might be, sounding like something pulled directly from that Peter Pan book his nephew was raving about, the title was real. Woodrow Wilson was about to begin negotiations with Kublai Khan, to ask the Golden Horde of sky pirates to assist in the defense of Europe.

Woodrow would have been laughing, but the wispy mustache and grim, condescending grin Kublai was flashing him now took all humor from the moment. He may have appeared on this Earth just a year ago, yet he understood 20th century politics just as well as his own 13th. Kublai found that politics in two universes, two Earths, had one thing in common: no one trusted each other.

“You seem to know why I have come,” Woodrow said.

Kublai only gestured his assent with an open palm, knowing that a Western man expected a nod as well. He wasn’t about to make any motion which would make this president feel he was on equal footing with the Great Khan. He sat in his golden throne a full three feet above the deck, leaving even a man of Wilson’s stature feeling small.

“Well then let’s not delay the matter.” Wilson straightened his spectacles and greatly wished for the counsel of his friend and first secretary of state, William Jennings Bryan. Yet when he glanced to his left, he saw Robert Lansing who, despite his curriculum vitae, Wilson did not entirely understand. Wilson gestured to his right. “My secretary of war, Mr. Newton Diehl Baker, will explain the situation to you.”

“Great Khan Kublai …” Baker began with a bow of his neck.

At this point, Kublai raised his hand in the universal sign to halt. “I hear you called the most powerful man on Earth, and yet you would have your inferior speak on your behalf?”

Woodrow had studied Khan’s politics, and knew that this was not an invitation to discuss philosophy. He knew Khan was only trying to shake his confidence before meaningful dialogue had begun. He suspected Khan cared far less about the American chain-of-command than about how invoking it could put the Horde in a better bargaining position. Wilson knew all this, and yet his emotional side fought to overwhelm him. He smiled slightly as he recalled something Lansing had informed him of that morning.

“How is business, Lord Khan? I understand you have good relations with the rulers of both Japan and China because you have helped them to return to the tradition of harems.”

Kublai was thoughtful. “Yes, your modern philosophers seem opposed to the practice of slavery, as my tradition is called here. So I proposed an alternative which makes all parties more … pleased.”

“Except of course for the women.”

“You can’t please everyone,” Kublai sipped wine from a richly carved wooden bowl. “So we please those in power. That is the truth of all political systems, regardless of their ideals. You are a political scholar, so you of all men should understand that.” He took another sip.

“Perhaps you are right, which is why I have brought you a gift.” Wilson turned and gestured at a large, polished mahogany box. Two attendants in U.S. Navy uniforms, but relieved of their sidearms outside the cabin, lifted the lid to reveal a black disc and filigreed metal armature.

“Ah, yes, one of your phonographic machines. You Americans seem quite enamored with them, though I cannot fathom why listening to the same piece of music repeatedly, without variation, is so entertaining.”

Wilson’s lip twitched at this, but he had turned his back on the Khan a moment before to pick up the needle arm of the New Edison machine and place it on the slowly turning disc. “Signor Ciccolini endorsed this model himself, saying It sounded more like him than any machine had a right to.”

“I have no use for Italians,” Khan said, taking a heavy sniff from his snuff box.

“This is not Mr. Ciccolini, but it is an Italian I think you will appreciate.”

As the music started, an androgynous voice made several of the men wince. Khan himself was unmoved. “Are you sure it is calibrated correctly. The pitch is … odd.”

“Quite sure,” Wilson smiled. “This man …”

“It is a man?”

“Yes, it most certainly is. A very talented man. A castrato.”

Kublai did not like to be uninformed, so he strained to find the meaning of the foreign word. “A eunuch?”

“Yes, the … operation was performed before puberty leaving him …”

“Not quite a man.”

“Physically, yes. He was well educated, though, and is renowned among musicians. He is the last of his kind, since the barbaric practice has ended.”

Kublai was silent for a long moment, listening to the high-pitched male voice. “I accept your gift. I, too, am a misfit in this time. I assure you, though, that I am fully a man. Shall I prove it?” He stood.

“That won’t be necessary,” said Wilson, adjusting his glasses unnecessarily. Lansing blushed.

Kublai grinned. “You mistake me. I only meant to prove I am a man through combat, or some other such contest. But I will not call your manhood into question.” He stepped down from his dais and strode to the Edison, carefully, reverently picking up the needle and setting the arm back on its rest. “That’s enough music for now. After a second in which Wilson almost reached for the switch, Kublai’s seeking eyes found it and he switched the turntable off. “That’s enough music for now. You will join me for dinner, and then, when we are not distracted by our bellies, we will discuss politics.”

Wilson smiled. “I look forward to hearing your reaction to Secretary Baker’s report.” He waited to see if Khan would now accept this apparent breach of decorum.

“Of course,” Khan smiled. “If you have chosen to castrate this politician by calling him secretary, a title usually reserved for a woman, then it would be rude of me to ignore your feelings on the matter.”

Baker bristled. “Lucky you are that you arrived here after the tradition of dueling had fallen out of fashion.”

“Lucky for you indeed,” Khan said. “Come, let’s eat.”

Thursday, October 20, 2011

On Faith - A new leaf?

I've noticed a few trends in myself. 1. I'm in a rut. 2. I don't write about faith. 3. I focus on things that don't matter in the long run. 4. Writing helps.

So I'm going to write things on this blog. No promises. No delusions of grandeur, but I hope it helps me and others.
Here's my thought of the moment, which began as a joke:

Those who pray to God and those who pray to Allah are trying to connect with the same entity. They just think He has a different e-mail address. Other faiths try to connect with entirely different protocols, but I think the body of their message is very similar.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

We need a better presidential candidate

The last NY Times article I forwarded to someone demonstrated quite well that they are not liberally biased. They counted money from some lobbyists, and said McCain is the only Senator who takes more money than Obama. Not exactly the "Captain Change" story, though I know they both spout changeisms now. "Mr. and Mrs. Maverick" have been taking all kinds of PAC money, and she campaigned on the Bridge to Nowhere initially in her first gubernatorial bid. I think Hillary, the "Woman Wonder," got out-shined in the primaries because of that word "change." It didn't stick to her, but now it's not sticking to either of the official candidates.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/10/us/politics/10fannie.html
On the other hand, I have a friend, a registered Democrat, who is more impressed by McCain more than Obama, simply because Obama talks more about change than his actual plan to do anything once he gets in office. Obama is losing in the specific plans department with people like my friend, and can see why.
I support Mark McCracken for Congress, and president. He says we can't fix anything domestic until we stop spending so much money overseas, cancel the Bush tax cuts, and start balancing the checkbook. I still stand by Obama, but I wish he had the power to excite me like that. The only thing my Democrat McCain-supporting friend and I can agree on unconditionally is this: the next president must balance the budget at all costs.

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Republican convention comments

She came fom the pole north,
to help McCain poles headed south.
She'd polarized the election mayor,
and taken farms while running on prayer.
McCain elected and dead she'd be pharoah,
her good friends just call her Sarah.

If you don't know what I mean, read this NY Times article: Palin’s Start in Alaska: Not Politics as Usual

At the Republcan convention, Giuliani is recycling his "never run anything" lack of executive experience argument against McCain to use it against Obama and Biden. Palin is recycling the "guns and religion" argument from the primary against Obama.
A nonprofit with ties to McCain recycled the Weathermen argument against Obama. I think I've even heard a reference to Rev. Wright recently used against Obama. I hate Republicans. It's too bad they have such a solid, polarized platform and there are only two parties. Otherwise my hate would be spread out across a lot more people. I can hate you all the same if you're all the same. A diverse group moves around too much to aim at.

Friday, September 14, 2007

Film With Same-Sex Parents Splits School District

In one town in New Jersey, half the parents think they can shield their children from the fact that some parents are same-sex. They want to discuss it in the home, rather than let an award-winning documentary director relay the truth through a video shown at school. Rather than let a montage of children, like the third grade viewers, tell them that same-sex couples are real and (blasphemy) actually healthy loving families.
The kids in the video are probably just like the kids your child will meet at school. Some of your child's classmates are bound to know about gay people and may even come from a family with two dads. Do you want to risk that they start a conflict by saying "your parents are both faggits" or "they're not your parents"?
You fundamentalists must be shaking in your boots. Divorce didn't go the way you wanted it to, and society may be better or worse (people are evenly divided on that, though I personally think marriage is underrated). Divorce didn't go your way either, and society didn't fall apart so you may be wrong. Hell, back i nthe day when slavery was illegal and women couldn't vote you didn't want to change. Now things are so different, and what's next but acceptance of different sexual lifestyles. If a homosexual family comes across to your kids as healthier than your own, you're done. Either that, or there'll be some new societal advance to stop from evolving. That reminds me, shouldn't we keep evolution out of schools? Yet another place where America is evenly divided.
If people can't agree on what God is, if God is, and most of all on what God wants with the SAME EVIDENCE, how the hell can a person who refuses to expose themselves and/or their children to some of that evidence hope to know the truth? This country is proof that humans don't know squat, and news like this is proof that 50% of humans don't know we don't know. See quote in last post.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Absolute rationalism - the irony

Education is a method whereby one acquires a higher grade of prejudices. - Laurence J. Peter
That certainly applies to Ken. It also reminds me of an inherent fallacy in liberal thinking: the conservation of an attitude that conservatives are wrong. Maybe conservatives fight against the lifting of traditional discrimination in societies. Maybe they got us into a wrong-headed war in Iraq and don't know how to win or quit. If you read that sentence and ignore the maybes, as I think Move-On.org and other super-liberals do, then you do NOT have a liberal open mind. Think about it.
On a personal note, the same goes for Ken. See the quote above. When you have a "higher standard" or rationality, reason, etc. you are in fact close-minded. Maybe you are open-minded about the status of women, or homosexuals or even people of many ethnicities. When you, as an absolutist atheist, demand that people with faith prove it with rational science, you are still closing your mind in that area. You make the quote true. That's the danger of absolutes, even "absolute open-mindedness." We are human, as God said. Need forgiveness? Ask Him.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Wealthy Killers - on Abortion

I today read an argument against abortion by a Christian doctor. He called doctors "wealthy killers" of "silently screaming" babies.
It made me think. First, I remember the strongest argument in the area of abortion which I heard during college philosophy classes. A woman said that abortion would be wrong so long as we lived in a society filled with people who could afford to adopt children as an alternative. So, views against abortion would be weaker in a weaker economy. Second, I remember that religion is strongest when an economy is poorest.
So, speaking from a mathematical perspective, religion is inversely proportional to economic health. The strength of pro lifers, a religion-motivated movement, should also be inversely proportional to economic health. I know, it makes my head hurt too.
My extrapolation is thus: So long as America is rich, Christianity will not have the pull it wants, but abortions will remain relatively uncommon. If the economy falters, Christianity would strengthen, but not without limits. There would be a breaking point, after which abortion would become a good idea, especially in the absence of birth control which some sects oppose.

Monday, May 7, 2007

Sectarian violence - The dumbest interpretation of religion … ever

72 were martyred in the initial Sunni-Shia struggle. How do you elevate them for sacrificing themselves in conflict with the "enemy" and not hold it against the faction who killed them? How can you praise the death of your friends and not dwell upon the murderers? Christianity, in some sects, has found an answer.
Historically, there was enmity between Jews and Christians. The operative word is deicide. At some point, most Christians and eventually the Catholic church grew tired of scapegoating Jewish populations. They accepted that it was Christ's place to die, or else he could not be sacrificed to appease God for the sins of man. One death put an end to the need for killing. Maybe the Shia and Sunni should learn from that, and stop fighting over who killed Hussein way-back-when.
If you look at the geographic distribution of Muslims, Shia is obviously the unpopular opinion. They maintain majority in only a couple countries, Iran and Iraq, as well as numerous scattered communities. Shia Muslims are to Sunnis as Jews are to Christians: "We're related, but God favored us over you. Therefore, you don't deserve your rights."
That's the same story behind all supremacy. The people in control find an explanation for their supremacy, not in history, culture or chance, but in unfounded divine intervention. It must be the color of my skin or the way I vote or the way I pray or the fact that my genitals are on the outside that makes me better than you. I thank God every day for social scientists which disrupt these excuses for violence and hegemony.
Speaking of God, I do believe that when He sent His Son, the message was "care for the least of these." Scapegoating the minority groups is the exact opposite of his teachings. Christians, if you want to be better than the other 10,000 religions in the world, remember that.

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Headline comment

Bush Assails Democrats on War Financing
In a perfect world, that headline would lead to a story where the leader of the free world berated his colleagues for funding war. Bush would be a hero who sought diplomacy, peace and prosperity for all. A man who funded those greater goals directly rather than hoped they would come some indefinite time in the future after a meandering march of military men.
No, in real life Mr. Bush says "pay for this war," even though he it hasn't accomplished any of the promises given before it started, and no one knows when it will end.
I wish the Democrats were the ones trying to fund a war that hadn't happened yet, so it coudl still be stopped before it starts. In a perfect world.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Losing the War on Terror, Iraq or not

"American officials say that the new intelligence is focused on Al Qaeda and points to the prospect that the terrorist network is gaining in strength despite more than five years of a sustained American-led campaign to weaken it." - NY Times today
How can we be winning the war on terror if Al Qaeda and Taliban forces have regrouped and strengthened in Asia? Osama is not directly involved but that's always been his role. Why don't we attack the people who are actually going to attack us, or quit lying to America Mr. Bush. I don't feel safe.